Concluding thoughts on the REACT Programme

Authors

  • Elisabeth Dunne The University of Winchester

Abstract

REACT, in many ways, has been about diversity: of type of institution; of students’ setting and intake; of current level of activity in relation to student engagement; of approaches to change, of roles and expertise of partner staff; of the particular purpose and activity of the ‘hard to reach’ engagement project undertaken and the stakeholders involved. As a consequence, and because the authors for this issue were encouraged to write in ways they considered appropriate rather than being given a standard template, the content and style of every paper are very different and each needs to be read for its own individual story. There are three agendas, however, which are fundamental to the REACT programme and outcomes. Each of these is discussed in turn: building evidence through a culture of evaluation and research; ‘hard to reach’ students and the notion of ‘reaching out’; the management of change in the context of REACT. The discussion reflects the learning of the REACT team, gained from working alongside the collaborative partner institutions, and includes comments from the independent evaluation undertaken by GuildHE to support points made.

 

Author Biography

Elisabeth Dunne, The University of Winchester

Elisabeth Dunne is the Director of the REACT project at the University of Winchester, having previously worked in numerous roles - from Senior Research Fellow to Head of Student Engagement and Skills – during nearly 30 years at the University of Exeter, where she notably founded the sector leading Students as Change Agents initiative. Liz is also Principal Fellow of the UK Higher Education Academy (HEA). 

References

Baron, P. and Corbin, L. (2012) ‘Student engagement rhetoric and reality.’ Higher Education Research & Development, 31(6).

The Department of Business Innovation & Skills [BIS] (2016) Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper (Accessed: 7 June 2017).

Bruner, J. S. (1960) The Process of Education. Cambridge, MA, and London: Harvard University Press.

Brown, P., Lauder, H. and Ashton, D. (2010) The global auction: The broken promises of education, jobs, and incomes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barr, N. (ed.) and Glennerster, H. (2013) ‘Preface’ to: Shaping higher education - 50 years after Robbins. London: London School of Economics and Political Science (LSE).

Caldwell, J., Toman, N., and Leahy, J. (2006) Diversity and Difference in the Learning

Experience of Students in Contemporary Mass Higher Education. Paper presented at NUI

Galway 4th Annual Conference on Teaching & Learning 8–9 June 2006.

Chang, M., Chang, J. C. and Ledesma, M. C. (2005) ‘Beyond magical thinking: Doing the real work of diversifying our institutions.’ About Campus, 10(2), 9-16.

Cook-Sather, A., Bovill, C. and Felten, P. (2014) Engaging Students as Partners in Learning and Teaching: A Guide for Faculty. New York: Jossey-Bass.

Dunne, E., Zandstra, R. (2011) Students as Change Agents in Learning and Teaching. Bristol: Higher Education Academy/ESCalate. Available at: http://escalate.ac.uk/8242 (Accessed: 23 July 2017).

Harper, S.R. and Quaye, S.J. (2009) Student Engagement in Higher Education: Theoretical Perspectives and Practical Approaches for Diverse Populations. London and New York: Routledge.

Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as

partners in learning and teaching in Higher Education. York: Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/sites/default/files/resources/Engagement_through_partnership.pdf (Accessed: 4 June 2017).

Kotter, J. (2012) The 8-step process for leading change. Available at:

https://www.kotterinternational.com/8-steps-process-for-leading-change/ (Accessed: 6 August 2017).

McGrath, C.H., Guerin, B., Harte, E., Frearson, M. and Manville, C. (2015) Learning gain in higher education. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.

QAA (2012) ‘Student Engagement.’ In: UK Quality Code for Higher Education, Chapter B5: Available at: http://www.qaa.ac.uk/publications/information-and-guidance/uk-quality-code-for-higher-education-chapter-b5-student-engagement#.WYef80JK2Uk (Accessed: 6 August 2017).

RBSGroup eu (2017) Change management - The 8-step process for leading change. Available at: http://www.rbsgroup.eu/assets/pdfs/2013_THE_8-STEP_PROCESS_FOR_LEADING_CHANGE.pdf (Accessed: 6 August 2017).

Quinn J., Thomas L., Slack K., Casey L., Thexton W. and Noble J. (2005) Rethinking working-class ‘drop out’ from higher education. Joseph Rowntree Foundation. Available at: http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialpolicy/0525.asp (Accessed: 6 August 2017).

Robbins, L. (1963) Higher Education: report of the Committee appointed by the Prime

Minister under the chairman-ship of Lord Robbins, 1961-63. Cmnd 2154, table 5. London: HMSO.

Scott, G. (2003) ‘Effective change management in higher education.’ Educause Review, 38(6), 64-80.

Trowler, V. (2010) Student Engagement Literature Review. York: Higher Education Academy. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf (Accessed: 25 May 2017).

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Zepke, N. (2013) ‘Student engagement: A complex business supporting the first year experience in tertiary education.’ The International Journal of the First Year in Higher Education, 4(2), 1-14.

Downloads

Published

10/02/2017

How to Cite

Dunne, E. (2017). Concluding thoughts on the REACT Programme. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(1), 320–329. Retrieved from https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/683

Issue

Section

Some Conclusions, and Where Next?