Developing an understanding of why students do not engage.

Authors

  • Julie Irwin Buckinghamshire New University
  • John Knight Buckinghamshire New University

Abstract

The aim of the Buckinghamshire New University REACT project was to develop a culture of engagement across the institution. This case study is a work-in-progress report of progress to date.

The project used an action research approach consisting of three cycles. The first involved analysis of quantitative data (NSS, progression and attrition statistics, module evaluations, DLHE statistics). The second is ongoing, exploring initial findings with a qualitative approach via focus groups and questionnaires. The third stage will involve developing and evaluating strategies for enhancing engagement on the basis of findings from cycles one and two.

Initial quantitative findings suggest a correlation between low levels of engagement and higher rates of attainment and attrition. Qualitative findings to date suggest that students are more likely to engage in extra-curricular activities where it is clear there is ‘something in it’ for them. It is also suggested that notions of student engagement might usefully be reframed to include staff and institutional engagement, acknowledging the need for students to feel that their involvement in university processes is valued, meaningful and acted upon and that they in turn are valued by their institutions.

Author Biographies

Julie Irwin, Buckinghamshire New University

Julie Irwin is the Assistant Director, Learning and Teaching with responsibilities for student engagement, student experience and the students as partners’ agenda. Her interests include how students develop a sense of belonging and curriculum design for student success.

John Knight, Buckinghamshire New University

John Knight is an Academic and Learning Developer with interests in transition, student engagement and the student experience of assessment. He is currently working on assessment workload and higher and degree apprenticeship curriculum design and delivery.

References

Bucks New University (2016) Bucks New University Equalities Statistics: Student HESA Data 2015/16. Available at: https://bucks.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0017/15641/equalities-monitoring-student-data-report-15-16.pdf (Accessed: 12 May 2017).

Bucks Students’ Union (2017) The Big Deal. Available at: https://www.bucksstudentsunion.org/activities/thebigdeal/ (Accessed: 12 May 2017).

McNiff, J. (1992) Action Research: principles and practice. London: Routledge.

Thomas, L., Hill, M., O’Mahony, J. and Yorke, M. (2017) Supporting student success: strategies for institutional change What Works? Student Retention & Success programme Final Report. London: Paul Hamlyn Foundation. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/downloads/what_works_2_-_full_report.pdf (Accessed: 10 May 2017).

Trowler, V. (2010) Student engagement literature review, HEA. York. Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/system/files/studentengagementliteraturereview_1.pdf (Accessed: 6 June 2017).

Universities UK (2015) Student mental wellbeing in higher education: good practice guide. London: Universities UK. Available at: http://www.universitiesuk.ac.uk/policy-and-analysis/reports/Documents/2015/student-mental-wellbeing-in-he.pdf (Accessed: 12 May 2017).

Downloads

Published

10/02/2017

How to Cite

Irwin, J., & Knight, J. (2017). Developing an understanding of why students do not engage. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(1), 198–203. Retrieved from https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/642

Issue

Section

Engagement, Belonging and Identity