Who sets the agenda on student engagement?

Authors

  • Emily McIntosh University of Bolton
  • Duncan Cross University of Bolton

Keywords:

student engagement, agenda setting

Abstract

 

The rise in UK university fees has prompted significant investment in the student experience, with increased emphasis on an agenda that promotes student engagement and partnership. Government papers, both white and green, have set out a policymaking agenda and have led to a reorganisation of the UK higher education funding structures, with the dissolution of long-standing funding bodies into the Office for Students. This enshrines chapter B6 of the QAA UK quality code for higher education with regard to student engagement and would appear to be a positive move forward. However, the Office for Students has limited student representation and this raises the question: ‘Who sets this agenda and who are the stakeholders?’ This opinion piece seeks both to highlight the necessity for a joint agenda-setting approach and to engage the community in developing a joint agenda on student engagement and partnership.

Author Biographies

Emily McIntosh, University of Bolton

Dr Emily McIntosh is a Principal Fellow of the HEA and the Director for Student Life at the University of Bolton, with research interests in resilience, personal tutoring and student transitions.

Duncan Cross, University of Bolton

Dr Duncan Cross is a Principal Fellow of the HEA and a Senior Lecturer in Education at the University of Bolton, with research interests in student transitions, managing expectations, and academic development.

References

Arvanitakis, J. and Hornsby, D. (2016) Universities, the Citizen Scholar and the Future of Higher Education, 1st ed. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

Bryson, C. (2016) ‘Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education.’ International Journal for Academic Development, 21(1), 84-86. DOI: 10.1080/1360144X.2016.1124966

Carey, P. (2013) Student as co-producer in a marketised higher education system: a case study of students’ experience of participation in curriculum design.’ Innovations in Education and Teaching International 50(3), 250-260. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14703297.2013.796714

Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2011) Higher Education: Students at the Heart of the System. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/31384/11-944-higher-education-students-at-heart-of-system.pdf (Accessed: 24 February 2017).

Department for Business Innovation and Skills (2015) Fulfilling our potential: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/474266/BIS-15-623-fulfilling-our-potential-teaching-excellence-social-mobility-and-student-choice-accessible.pdf (Accessed: 24 February 2017).

Flint, A. (2015) ‘Students and staff as partners in innovation and change.’ Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 1(1).

Hoadley, C. (2012) ‘What is a community of practice and how can we support it?’ In: Jonassen D.H. and Land S.M. (eds.) Theoretical foundations of learning environments. New York, NY: Routledge, 287-300.

Russell, E. (2015) ‘What does partnership produce?’ Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 1(2).

Downloads

Published

12/15/2017

How to Cite

McIntosh, E., & Cross, D. (2017). Who sets the agenda on student engagement?. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 3(2). Retrieved from https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/540