Are all students 'hard to reach' in a digital higher education (H.E.) context?
Abstract
Students entering Higher Education (HE) have high levels of digital capability built on the need to be socially-connected; they should be 'easy to reach’ if thinking about connectivity underpinning the digital age. Yet findings based on commissioned work exploring digital capability and teaching excellence (Austen et al, 2016) indicate that student appraisals of this relationship relate to the logistical benefits of technology rather than to the development of capabilities for professional practice, i.e. the multi-faceted set of academic and information-retrieval skills. Our study highlights a pedagogical challenge in needing to re-frame digital capability for all learners new to HE as this 'hard to reach' phenomenon is maintained by a student focus on technological hygiene factors rather than supported risk-taking.
References
Austen, L., Parkin, H. J., Jones-Devitt, S., McDonald, K. and Irwin, B. (2016) Digital capability and teaching excellence: an integrative review exploring what infrastructure and strategies are necessary to support effective use of technology enabled learning (TEL). Gloucester: QAA.
Beetham, H. and Sharpe, R. (2013) Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age: Designing for 21st century learning. New York: Routledge.
Comas-Quinn, A. (2011) 'Learning to teach online or learning to become an online teacher:
An exploration of teachers' experiences in a blended learning course.' ReCALL, 23(3), 218-232.
The Department of Business Innovation & Skills [BIS] (2016) Success as a Knowledge Economy: Teaching Excellence, Social Mobility and Student Choice. Available at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/higher-education-success-as-a-knowledge-economy-white-paper (Accessed: 7 April 2017).
Endsleigh (2015) Student Survey. Available at: https://www.endsleigh.co.uk/press-releases/10-august-2015/ (Accessed: 15 February 2017).
Henderson, M., Selwyn, N. and Aston, R. (2015) 'What works and why? Student perceptions of 'useful' digital technology in university teaching and learning.' Studies in Higher Education, 1(13).
Hutchings, M., Quinney, A. and Galvin, K. (2014) 'Negotiating the triple helix: Harnessing technology for transformation.' Proceedings of the International Conference on e-Learning, ICEL 2014, 76-85.
Kirkwood, A. (2014) 'Teaching and learning with technology in higher education: blended and distance education needs joined-up thinking rather than technological determinism.' Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(3), 206-221.
Neves, J. and Hillman, N. (2016) The 2016 Student Academic Experience Survey. The Higher Education Academy and Higher Education Policy Institute. Available at: http://www.hepi.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Student-Academic-Experience-Survey-2016.pdf (Accessed: 15 February 2017).
The Robbins Report (1963) Higher Education: Report of the Committee appointed by the Prime Minister under the Chairmanship of Lord Robbins. London: Her Majesty's Stationery Office.
Seale, J., Georgeson, J., Mamas, C. and Swain, J. (2015) 'Not the right kind of digital capital? An examination of the complex relationship between disabled students, their technologies and higher education institutions.' Computers & Education, 82, 118-128.
Sorgo, A., Bartol, T., Dolnicar, D. and Boh Podgornik, B. (2016) 'Attributes of digital natives as predictors of information literacy in higher education.' British Journal of Educational Technology, DOI:10.1111/bjet.12451.
Torrisi-Steele, G and Drew, S. (2013) 'The literature landscape of blended learning in higher education: the need for better understanding of academic blended practice.' International
Journal for Academic Development, 18(4), 371-383.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright is held by the journal. The author has full permission to publish to their institutional repository. Articles are published under an Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International licence.
