Transforming the relationship between staff and students to effect change

Authors

  • Iman Hassan Aston University
  • Sarah Hayes Aston University

Keywords:

Equally legitimate partners, technology from a student perspective, higher learning

Abstract

This opinion piece argues for the necessity of student-staff partnerships that go beyond the common rhetoric of ‘student engagement’, achieving a richer student and staff dialogue which results in more meaningful change in policy and practice. In particular, attention is drawn to the need for such partnerships when determining technology applications that are often missed out from, or treated in isolation from, the curriculum design process. This piece cites, as an example, a student-led taught day on the Post Graduate Diploma in Learning and Teaching at Aston University in July 2015. There was clear evidence that the staff participants designed their assessments with student partners in mind. It is therefore proposed that a partnership relationship offers an effective means of moving forward from common practices where technology simply replicates, or supplements, traditional activities.

Author Biography

Sarah Hayes, Aston University

Sarah Hayes is a Lecturer in the Centre for Learning Innovation and Professional Practice (CLIPP) at Aston University and a Senior Fellow of the HEA. She has taught PG Cert, through to MEd during the last 18 months. Prior to this, Sarah taught Sociology, writing modules for undergraduates, such as Technology & Social Theory and Tattoos, TV & Trends: Understanding Popular Culture, and teaching Research Methods at all levels, including NVivo, to staff and research students during the last 6 years. Sarah’s PhD thesis: The Political Discourse and Material Practice of Technology Enhanced Learning (TEL) was a Marxist-based analysis of UK policy discourse for TEL in Higher Education during the last 15 years, through corpus-based Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA). It revealed a presupposition that technology alone has enhanced learning, where policy texts conceal the human labour involved. It recommended resistance to simplified claims politically, in the name of technology, by explicitly writing the actions of people back into policy, to acknowledge the humans involved. Sarah’s recent work is published in Open Review of Educational Research , Sage, Springer and Libri . Sarah is lead editor for a call for papers with Addleton Academic Publishers Learning Technologies and Time in the Age of Global Neoliberal Capitalism. Sarah recently completed a literature review for the QAA on MOOCs and the Quality Code.

References

Healey, M., Flint, A., and Harrington, K. (2014) Engagement through partnership: students as partners in learning and teaching in higher education. York: Higher Education Academy.

Higher Education Academy (2015) Digital Literacies in the Disciplines (DLinD). Available at: https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/workstreams-research/themes/online-learning/online-learning-projects/digital-literacies-disciplines (Accessed: 4 November 2015).

Kellner, D. (1998) ‘Multiple literacies and critical pedagogy in a multicultural society.’ Educational Theory, 48(1), 103-122.

Kirkwood, A. and Price, L. (2014) ‘Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review.’ Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6-36.

Little, S. (ed.) (2011) Staff-student partnerships in higher education. London: Continuum.

Molesworth, M., Nixon, E. and Scullion, R. (2009) ‘Having, being and higher education: the marketisation of the university and the transformation of the student into consumer.’ Teaching in Higher Education, 14(3), 277-287.

Downloads

Published

01/09/2016

How to Cite

Hassan, I., & Hayes, S. (2016). Transforming the relationship between staff and students to effect change. The Journal of Educational Innovation, Partnership and Change, 2(1). Retrieved from https://journals.studentengagement.org.uk/index.php/studentchangeagents/article/view/244

Issue

Section

Opinion Pieces