Typo-Resource: developing T&L support materials through collaboration

Peter Loveland, Jeanne-Louise Moys, Hannah Tollett, Melissa Towriss


This paper reports on a collaborative project between staff and students in the Department of Typography & Graphic Communication at the University of Reading. The Partnerships in Learning and Teaching (PLanT) project here described is a direct response to student needs for better online support materials. Methodologically, the project embeds user-centred design principles within an iterative process of design development and participant research. This process has underpinned the development of a prototype for an online interface called Typo-Resource. The resulting initial prototypeaddresses the usability and user experience dimensions of an online learning resource, moving beyond providing tutor-identified sets of resources to a multifaceted, collaborative, and visual platform for peer learning.


Collaboration; graphic communication; technology-enhanced learning; usability; user-centred design; visual interface design

Full Text:



Beetham, H. (2014) ‘Literacies development framework.’ Jisc: The Design Studio: Developing your digital literacies. Available at: http://jiscdesignstudio.pbworks.com/w/file/67486675/Literacies%20development%20framework%20new.doc (Accessed: 27 November 2015).

Buzzetto-More, N. A. (2012) ‘Social networking in undergraduate education.’ Interdisciplinary Journal of Information, Knowledge, and Management, 7, 63-90.

Ellmers, G. (2006). ‘Reflection and graphic design pedagogy: developing a reflective framework to enhance learning in a graphic design tertiary environment.’ 2006 ACUADS Conference: Thinking the future: Art, Design and Creativity. Melbourne: Faculty of Art & Design, Monash University & School of Art, Victorian College of the Arts.

Greenberg, S. (1996) ‘Teaching Human Computer Interaction to Programmers.’ Research report 96/582/02, Department of Computer Science, University of Calgary.

Logan, C. D. (2006) ‘Circles of practice: educational and professional graphic design.’ The Journal of Workplace Learning, 18(6), 331-343.

Manca, S. and M. Ranieri (2013) ‘Is it a tool suitable for learning? A critical review of the literature on Facebook as a technology-enhanced learning environment.’ Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 29, 487-504.

Park, J. Y. and L. Kastanis (2009) ‘Reflective learning through social network sites in design education.’ The International Journal of Learning 16(8), 11-21.

Parslow, P., Lundqvist, K. Ø., Williams, S., Ashton, R. and Evans, M. (2008) Facebook & Blackboard: comparative view of learning environments. In: SSE Systems Engineering Conference 2008, 25–26 September 2008, The University of Reading.

Polanyi, M. (1967) The tacit dimension. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul Ltd.

Schön, D. A. (1995) The reflective practitioner: how professionals think in action. Aldershot: Arena.

Souleles, N. (2012) ‘Perceptions of undergraduate graphic design students on the educational potential of Facebook.’ Research in Learning Technology, 20, 241-253.

Wang, T. (2010) ‘A New Paradigm for Design Studio Education.’ International Journal of Art & Design Education, 29, 173-183.

Wang, F. and M. J. Hannafin (2005) ‘Design-based research and technology-enhanced learning environments.’ Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(4), 5-23.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v2i1.238


  • There are currently no refbacks.