Student-led development and evaluation of a community pharmacy-based cardiovascular risk assessment

Christine Filion-Murphy, Lyndsey Hands, Lyndsey Hockham, Laura Kirkpatrick, Sinead McNamara, Alison Strath, Iain Rowe, Helen Vosper

Abstract


Robert Gordon Universitys key strength is employability (reflecting close liaison with the professions) and courses must therefore offer opportunities for work-based learning, which can be challenging in the current financial climate. This is a particular problem for Pharmacy: opportunities for placement are extremely limited and tend to be focused on the later years of the course. This late and limited exposure to practice is thought to be responsible for significant failures in the ability of students and newly-qualified pharmacists to take their knowledge of science and medicines and apply it in the context of solving clinical problems. Furthermore, a lack of engagement with practice makes it difficult for the theoretical learning (especially the underpinning science) to be effectively contextualised, leading to an artificial segregation of the science and practice sections of the course. While pharmacists must be technically capable, success depends on a broader range of non-technical skills, including communication and empathy as well the ability to deal with the unexpected. Simulation is used as a partial alternative to the practice environment, but there are often vast differences between these highly-managed scenarios and the real situations encountered in practice. Since there is no ideal setting for a pharmacist, students should be educated and trained with an understanding, at the forefront of their minds, of human factors - something which challenges existing course design. Teaching and learning activities must allow students to explore the differences between the ideal and real clinical environments and to recognise when deviations from the ideal are likely to affect patient safety. This paper discusses a piece of action research by MPharm undergraduate students, exploring ways in which such activities may be developed. These new activities are based upon an existing cardiovascular risk assessment, currently used to deliver scientific theory and develop technical skills, and involving the identification of modifiable and non-modifiable risk factors and the use of these to calculate the ten-year risk of cardiovascular disease.

The approach involved the building of two simulated scenarios, one representing an ideal risk assessment and the other reflecting adverse outcomes arising as a result of practice-based problems. Developing the simulations required an in-depth analysis of factors contributing to outcomes, and a combination of interviews with healthcare professionals and peer-peer focus groups were used to explore this. This paper discusses the challenges and learning points arising from this work, as well as an evaluation of the ways in which the work was used to enhance teaching in the academic session 2013-14.


Keywords


Employability; Assessment; Work-based learning; Student engagement; Simulation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bryant, L.J.M., Coster, G., Gamble, G.D., McCormick, R.N. (2009) ‘General practitioners’ and pharmacists’ perception of the role of community pharmacists in delivery of clinical services.’ Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy 5, 347-362.

Fanning, R.M., Gaba, D.M. (2007) ‘The role of debriefing in simulation-based learning.’ Simulation in Healthcare 2(2), 115-125.

General Pharmaceutical Council (2010) ‘Standards for the initial education and training of pharmacists.’ Available at: http://www.pharmacyregulation.org/education/education-standards (Accessed: 20 September 2014).

Horgan, J.M., Blenkinsopp, A., McManus, R.J. (2010) ‘Evaluation of a cardiovascular disease opportunistic risk assessment pilot (‘Heart MOT’ service) in community pharmacies.’ Journal of Public Health 32,110-116.

McClinchy, J., Dickinson. A., Barron, D., Thomas, H. (2013) ‘Practitioner and patient experiences of giving and receiving healthy eating advice.’ British Journal of Community Nursing 18(10), 498-504.

National Health Service Scotland (2011) ‘A route map to the 2020 Vision for Health and Social Care.’ Available at: http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Topics/Health/Policy/Quality-Strategy/routemap2020vision (Accessed: 20 September 2014).

National Quality Board (2013) ‘Human factors in healthcare. A concordat from the National Quality Board.’ Available at: http://www.england.nhs.uk/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/nqb-hum-fact-concord.pdf (Accessed: 20 September 2014).

Regan, K., Harney, L., Goodhand, K., Strath, A., Vosper, H. (2014) ‘Pharmacy simulation: A Scottish, student-led perspective with implications for the UK and beyond.’ Pharmacy 2, 50-64.

Seybert, A. (2011) ‘Patient simulation in pharmacy education.’ American Journal of Pharmacy Education 75(9), Article 187.

Smith, A., Darracott, R. (2011) Review of pharmacist undergraduate education and pre-registration training and proposals for reform. Report to the Medical Education England Board.

Vosper, H., Brown, A., Mackenzie-Fraser, M., Goodhand, K., Joseph, S., Diack, L. (2013) ‘Simulation as a tool for supporting teaching, learning and assessment in an undergraduate pharmacy programme.’ Compendium of Effective Practice in Higher Education: Volume 2. The Higher Education Academy, York, UK. Available at: http://www.heacademy.ac.uk/assets/documents/retention/Compendium_2_rc_ja_Final.pdf (Accessed: 20 July 2014).




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21100/jeipc.v1i2.176

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.